Melnik v. Mikolic

Karl Melnik, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Matthew Mikolic, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-2546-FT.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed: March 9, 2004.

Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J.

¶1. PER CURIAM.

Matthew Mikolic appeals a judgment reforming a land contract between him and the seller, Karl Melnik.[1] Although the accepted offer to purchase and other evidence identified the parcel as 120 acres, the contract's metes and bounds description included 164.88 acres. The trial court found that these inconsistencies evinced a mutual mistake that necessitated reformation of the metes and…