Legal Opinion

Beberman v. Beberman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1954No. 36,141PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

The facts in this case are somewhat complicated, but for the purposes of this decision the material facts may be stated as follows: On and prior to April 12, 1918, Harry Beberman was engaged in a foundry business. He then owned a foundry building, which we shall refer to as the old foundry, and had commenced building another, which we shall refer to as the new foundry. He was having financial difficulties, both in meeting his obligations and in completing the new building. On that date he owned a real estate mortgage on other property worth $3,000; machinery in the foundry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cullen v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Sanderson v. EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Meighen v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Gandrud v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Anderson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Proulx v. Hirsch Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Mavco, Inc. v. EgginkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Mavco, Inc. v. EgginkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API