Ahle v. Veracity Research Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 3, 2009, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Plaintiffs Douglas Ahle (“Ahle”), Andrew Jordan (“Jordan”), and William Wiseman’s (“Wiseman”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 18]. Plaintiffs’ Motion seeks dismissal of all of Defendant Veracity Research Co.’s (‘Veracity”) counterclaims on the ground that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
II.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Titus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Onepoint Solutions, Llc, a Georgia Limited Liability Company v. Michael Borchert William CatuzziCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cortez v. Nebraska Beef, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2010
- Pecore v. Jennie-O Turkey Store, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Ahle v. Veracity Research Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Bachman v. BachmanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
- Egan v. A.W. Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.