Goodrich v. Dearborn County
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBaker, Judge
Initially, I wish to note that I was a member of the motions panel that restricted this appeal to issues arising from the denial of the Trial Rule 60(B) motion. I acknowledge now that this finding was incorrect and that Goodrich was entitled to consideration under Trial Rule 72(BE). It is therefore proper that we consider the trial court's ruling as a grant of an extension of time pursuant to Trial Rule 72(E).
But just because I made one mistake does not mean that I need to make another. For that reason, I cannot agree with the majority's conclusion that Goodrich substantially complied with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McBain v. Hamilton CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kiskowski v. O'HARAIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ransburg v. KirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ThorntonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993