Legal Opinion

Credit Service Co. v. Payne

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Section 31Ü, Ur. L., reads in part as follows:.

“Whenever the defendant shall have appeared in the action, he may apply, upon notice to the plaintiff, to the court or judge where the action is pending, or to the clerk of such court, for an order to discharge the attachment upon the execution of the undertaking mentioned in the next section; * * ”

The next section (311, Or. L.), provides in effect, that upon such application, the defendant shall deliver to the court or judge to whom the application is made an undertaking, executed by one or more sureties, “to the effect that the sureties will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bunneman & Martononi v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fazzano v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Ebner v. HeidCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API