Legal Opinion

Tatum v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 29, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is earnestly insisted by counsel for the defendant that the evidence is not legally sufficient to support the verdict. This court has held that, in a prosecution for assault with the intent to kill, it is necessary to show a specific intent to take life under such circumstances that, if death ensues, the accused would be guilty of murder in the first or second degree. It was also held that, in determining whether or not such intent existed, the jury should take into consideration the manner of assault, the nature of the weapon used, the manner in which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clardy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  3. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
  4. Stepp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Keirsey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Rhine v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API