Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Cone

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1914No. 8003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Fremont District Court. — Hon. Charles A. Wilkin, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

1. The facts are contained in a stipulation between the parties substantially as follows: In 1905, James J. Cone and James H. Peabody were interested as owners and officers in the First National Bank of Canon City. Among the bank assets was listed some paper to which the examiner objected. To meet this objection Cone, Peabody and others borrowed $10,000 from the First National Bank of Denver, (plaintiff in error) giving their notes therefor dated April 1,1905. Cone died August 13, 1905. September 5,1905, Annie E. C'one, his widow, (defendant in error) was appointed executrix of his estate.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon-Tiger Mining & Reduction Co. v. LoomerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Hobson v. HobsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Alvater v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. Cone v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Bender v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  3. Lego v. OlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API