Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 5, 2018No. S17G0501PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINES, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether an affidavit executed in support of an application for a search warrant that does not specifically say that the residence to be searched is the residence of the suspect may nevertheless be sufficient to establish that connection *115based on inferences that can be drawn from the affidavit and thus be sufficient to establish a nexus between the evidence to be seized and the place to the searched. See Taylor v. State , 338 Ga. App. 804, 813-815 (2) (a), 792 S.E.2d 101 (2016). We conclude that an affidavit may be sufficient…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. James Howard LaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. John T. Hunter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Kenneth RoseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  2. Andre Pugh v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  4. State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  5. State v. LEDBETTER (And Vice Versa)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API