Legal Opinion

Baker v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 23, 1966No. 16756PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

The major question determinative of the correct disposition of this case is whether plaintiffs are to be foreclosed, under the doctrine of res judicata, from claiming title to real estate as the result of cer tain action in a former suit upon their motion for judgment nunc pro tunc — made for the purpose of amending and correcting a judgment previously entered. In the prior case the defendant (in the instant case) was co-plaintiff with those who are present plaintiffs.

Smith v. Baker, 380 S.W.2d 725 (Waco Civ.App., 1964, writ, ref., n. r. e. at 383 S.W.2d 570),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Baker v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. State Bar of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  2. Bartkowiak v. Quantum Chemical Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  3. Ryan v. Fort Worth National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Janice Bartkowiak v. Quantum Chemical Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  5. Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API