Legal Opinion

Kraft v. Goldstein

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1931No. 1895Published

1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.

The case is before this court upon a petition in error, two principal errors being claimed; first,- it is claimed that the court erred in depriving the defendant of her right to have the case 'submitted to the jury; and second, that the court erred in not granting defendant’s motion for a judg-> ment in her favor.

As to the first claimed error, we are clearly of the opinion that the motions of the parties being made as they were, did not have the effect of waiving a jury and empowering the court to determine questions of fact. The two motions were not pending before the court at the same time,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Kimm v. SteketeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. De Berard v. PrialAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API