Legal Opinion

City of New York v. New Saint Mark's Baths

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard W. Wallach, J.

Motions Nos. 113, 114, and 171 on the Special Term Part I Calendar of December 27, 1985 are consolidated for disposition as follows:

Motions Nos. 113, by intervenors Corrigan, et al., and 171 by David Axelrod, M.D., as New York State Commissioner of *912Health, and Robert Abrams, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, for leave to intervene in this action are granted without opposition. Separate orders granting this relief have been signed and entered.

Motion No. 114 by plaintiffs pursuant to specified sections of the Administrative Code of the City…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Recreational Developments of Phoenix, Inc. v. City of PhoenixDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999
  2. Ware v. Valley Stream High School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Doe v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. City of New York v. New Saint Mark's BathsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. City of New York v. New Saint Mark's BathsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API