Legal Opinion
Karpuk v. Karpuk
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clinton T. Horton,
Official Referee. This is a motion for an order directing entry nunc pro tunc of an interlocutory judgment of divorce as of January 26, 1922. The judgment was actually entered on May 24, 1926. The attorney for the plaintiff died on February 11, 1925, without having entered the judgment which had been granted on the first date above mentioned. No reason has been given for his failure to do so. After his death the plaintiff engaged another attorney who obtained pérmission from the court and entered the judgment on said May 24, 1926.
The action above referred to has been duly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Philadelphia, Reading & New England RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Jewett v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Daine v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Ward v. LupinacciIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gehm v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- In Re the Estate of ShippyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Emmons v. StillwellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.