Dicanio v. State Bank of Washington
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellants-plaintiffs Victor Dicanio et al. (Dicanio), former shareholders who dissented to the merger of the appellee State Bank of Washington (Bank), appeal from a judgment for the value of their shares without interest from the valuation date to judgment.
We affirm.
A majority of Bank's shareholders approved and adopted a proposed merger involving Bank on August 30, 1983. Thereafter, Dicanio (and other dissenters) made a timely demand for payment of the value of their shares. In response, Bank offered Dicanio the sum of $47 per share. After failing to reach…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Indiana Industries, Inc. v. Wedge Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schnull v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Pittston Co. v. O'HARASupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Norton v. Union Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915
- General Grain, Inc. v. GoodrichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.