Legal Opinion

Dicanio v. State Bank of Washington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1986No. 1-1085A257Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellants-plaintiffs Victor Dicanio et al. (Dicanio), former shareholders who dissented to the merger of the appellee State Bank of Washington (Bank), appeal from a judgment for the value of their shares without interest from the valuation date to judgment.

We affirm.

A majority of Bank's shareholders approved and adopted a proposed merger involving Bank on August 30, 1983. Thereafter, Dicanio (and other dissenters) made a timely demand for payment of the value of their shares. In response, Bank offered Dicanio the sum of $47 per share. After failing to reach…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indiana Industries, Inc. v. Wedge Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Schnull v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Pittston Co. v. O'HARASupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. Norton v. Union Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915
  5. General Grain, Inc. v. GoodrichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API