Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Thiokol Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided May 30, 1980No. 78-6375-11-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

BORTNER, J.,

This matter draws our attention to the test for exclusionary effect in municipal zoning as it pertains to Bristol Township. Specifically, this court is asked to determine whether recent Pennsylvania cases which find zoning ordinances unacceptable when they have an exclusionary effect seek to guard against the exclusion of certai n forms of housing or certain types of people.

This court does not believe that lumber and blueprints have civil rights which we may protect. It is the right of human beings, however, to make housing decisions without the hinderance of exclusionary,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API