Legal Opinion

Novotny v. Danforth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Yankton county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action for damages to real and personal property. There was a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. A particular or special description will always control a general or implied description. 2 Am. & Eng.

Read the full summary

Appeal from circuit court, Yankton county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Action for damages to real and personal property. There was a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. A particular or special description will always control a general or implied description. 2 Am. & Eng. Encyc. of Law, 498; Gilman v. Smiths, 12 Vt. 40; Cummings v. Black, 25 Atl. 906; Whiting v. Dewey, 15 Pick. 434; Haynes v. Young, 36 Me, 557; Sanders v. Godding, 45 la. 463; Doe v. Porter, 3 Ark. 18, 36 Am. Dec. 448. One about to make an excavation must give reasonable notice, so…

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This was an action to recover damages to the real and personal property of the plaintiff, alleged to have resulted from the wrongful and negligent excavation made by the defendants on land'adjacent to plaintiff’s land. The answer was a general denial. Verdict and judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

In addition to a general verdict,1 the jury found as follows, upon special issues submitted to them: “(1) When did the plaintiff, Novotny, first know that the defendant, Danforth intended to excavate east of and adjacent to his (Novotny’s) lot? A. The day the excavation commenced…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wendt v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Ulrick v. Dakota Loan & Trust Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Neyman v. PincusMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Malmstad v. McHenry Telephone Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Jamison v. Myrtle Lodge No. 355Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Davis v. C. & J. Michel Brewing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lemon v. LittleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API