Legal Opinion

Herriman City v. Swensen

District Court, D. Utah

Decided October 11, 2007No. 2:07-cv-711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

TED STEWART, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Emergency Relief and Permanent Injunction. Plaintiffs’ seek to enjoin a ballot measure initiated by the cities of Cottonwood Heights, Sandy, Draper, and Midvale (the “Interlocal Agreement Participants”), on the question of whether a new school district (the “East Side School District”) should be created within the current boundaries of the Jordan and Granite School Districts. Under the statutory scheme at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Herriman v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API