Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1997No. 05-96-01664-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANKINSON, Justice.

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Latun Thomas’s motion to suppress the results of his intoxilyzer breath test and related evidence. Appellee claims the State obtained this evidence in violation of federal and state law. The appellate record, however, was not filed on its due date, September 23, 1996. Instead, the transcript and the statement of facts were tendered on October *5412, 1996 and October 4, 1996, respectively. The Clerk of this Court notified the State by letters that neither the transcript nor the statement of facts was timely filed. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Smith v. Grace, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  3. Marin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Martin Rivera Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
  2. State v. Martin Rivera Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API