Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 11, 1983PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

Following a jury trial, John 0. Howard was convicted of first degree rape (11 Del.C. § 764), first degree kidnapping (11 Del.C. § 783A), first degree conspiracy (11 Del.C. § 513), and third degree assault (11 Del.C. § 611). In this appeal from those convictions, he argues three points: 1) he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights; 2) the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing a guilty plea offered during trial; and 3) the defendant’s motion for a new trial was improperly denied. We disagree and affirm these convictions.

I

Walking home in the early…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Somerville v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Bryan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API