Legal Opinion

People v. Hambric

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*634At a proceeding to determine whether the defendant would waive his right to a jury trial, the defendant told the court that he wished to relieve his fourth court-appointed attorney. The defendant failed to articulate any legitimate reason for his request. The court refused to appoint another attorney and told the defendant that he could proceed pro se or with his court-appointed lawyer. The court warned the defendant of the dangers of proceeding pro se, but the defendant would not consent to his court-appointed attorney’s representing him. The court then appointed the attorney to act as the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. GlosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. HowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Pizarro v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. GundyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API