Legal Opinion

Penfield v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1907Published

Motioh for a relaxation of costs.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The plaintiff demurred to the separate defense set up in the answer and the demurrer ivas sustained, with costs. Upon the taxation of the-costs the clerk disallowed, among others, the item “ costs before notice of trial,” which is the only one the plaintiff seeks to review. In Jones v. Butler, 82 Hun, 91, the plaintiff demurred to certain para*40graphs in the answer. The demurrer was sustained, with leave to amend, and it was held that the judgment entered was simply interlocutory and not final, and that in the taxation of costs the plaintiff was improperly allowed the item for proceedings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. de Turckheim v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Garrett v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API