Bolton v. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
The district court issued an order for summary judgment on Malcolm Bolton’s claims against respondents for defamation, violation of the “Whistleblower Act,” common law retaliatory discharge, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and violation of Bolton’s rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court issued a separate order denying Bolton’s request to submit additional evidence and to extend the time for discovery. Bolton has challenged both orders on appeal from the final judgment entered pursuant to the court’s summary judgment order. We affirm in part, reverse in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bolton v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005