Legal Opinion
Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 10, 1984No. 82 Civ. 1538(MEL)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
I
In this action, which arises out of the collapse of the silver market in the spring of 1980, defendants move pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment. The motion is denied.
The plaintiff, Mahmoud Fustok (“Fustok”) is a wealthy Saudi Arabian business man and investor. 1 Defendant Conticommodity Services, Inc. (“Conti”), is a commodities broker registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission and is a member of various exchanges including the Commodity Exchange, Inc. (“Comex”). The individual defendants, Norton Waltuch,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Roto-Lith, Ltd. v. F. P. Bartlett & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- In the Matter of Pubs, Inc. Of Champaign, Bankrupt. Appeal of Bank of Illinois in Champaign, ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Corporacion De Mercadeo Agricola v. Mellon Bank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Brener v. Becker Paribas Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Evanston Bank v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- McMahon v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.