Pantry Pride Enterprises, Inc. v. Velazquez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment for compensatory damages. See Ferguson v. Seaboard Air Line R.R., 400 F.2d 473, 475 (5th Cir.1968) (“Florida adheres to the ‘election of remedy’ theory”). We reverse the award of punitive damages, however, upon a holding that the evidence taken in the light most favorable to Velazquez is, nevertheless, insufficient to establish the necessary willful and wanton misconduct required by law. See White Constr. Co. v. Dupont, 455 So.2d 1026 (Fla.1984); Ten Assocs. v. Brunson, 492 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White Const. Co., Inc. v. DupontSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- W. K. Ferguson and F. M. Nees v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Ten Associates v. BrunsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986