Legal Opinion

Van Horn v. Chicago Roller Skate Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 30, 1953No. 53 C 1142PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LA BUY, District Judge.

Plaintiff herein has filed a motion for a more definite statement as to defend-, ant’s First Defense. Said First Defense alleges the complaint fails td state a claim in either count thereof against these defendants upon which relief can be granted.

It is clear that plaintiff’s choice of motion to accomplish what he desires is improper. A motion for a more definite statement will lie only where the moving party is required or permitted' to file a responsive pleading. Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U. S.C.A. The procedural device to test the sufficiency…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenblatt v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API