In Re Thow
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR ACCESS
PHILIP H. BRANDT, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the court are motions brought by news media seeking to intervene in this Chapter 15 1 proceeding for the limited purpose of gaming access to the Rule 2004 examination of the Debtor, taken by the foreign representative, and to the record of that examination (which has not been filed), as well as access to any future examinations.
I conclude that the public interest in allowing the media to bring their motions is cause for intervention, but that the Rule 2004 examination is in the nature of discovery, and good cause to deny…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simon v. FIA Card Services, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- In Re SheetzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011