Legal Opinion
Appointment of Interpreter in State v. Tai V. Le
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1994No. 93-1351-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This court granted a petition to bypass in this case, pursuant to sec. (Rule) 809.60, Stats. The State Public Defender (SPD) filed the petition to bypass in an appeal of a portion of an order entered in the Circuit Court, Dane County, Honorable Daniel R. Moeser, judge, by which the SPD was ordered to compensate an interpreter for defense counsel's use out-of-*863court in the case State v. Tai V. Le, Dane County Circuit Court, Case No. 93-CF-500.1
The Director of State Courts (DSC) was required in the same order to pay the costs of the interpreter for in - court use. That portion of the order is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Ervin v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Tucker v. MarcusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WittrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- APPOINTMENT OF INTERPRETER IN STATE v. LeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994