Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1957No. 15782PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

Travis Stanford and W. B. Brooks et al. were real property owners, their properties lying within a city residential subdivision platted and dedicated of record as in the usual and customary case. There are two important elements regarding the time and the act of the dedication, they being: (1) ownership in fee by the dedicator without restriction of all the land subdivided, and (2) certain provisions in the dedication reserving unto the dedicator (and to his assigns or grantees thereof) the right to waive certain restrictions of the dedication. One of the restrictive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Curlee v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hooper v. LottmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Couch v. Southern Methodist UniversityTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Hill v. TriggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Klein v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Watson v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Employers' National Life Insurance Co. of Dallas v. WillitsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. McClanahan v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Suttle v. BaileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Kent v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API