In re N. B.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentTyson, Judge
I. Mootness
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to dismiss this appeal as moot. The trial court did not have jurisdiction over DSS’s petition to terminate respondents’ parental rights (“TPR petition”) while the adjudication and disposition order that purportedly gave DSS legal custody over the minor child is properly pending on appeal to this Court. The entry of the TPR judgment does not render this appeal moot.
The two petitions must be considered separately in the case at bar. The first petition (“underlying petition”), from which respondents appeal, is the original petition…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- RPR & Associates, Inc. v. University of North Carolina-Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- In Re StrattonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Pate v. Eastern Insulation Service of New Bern, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991