Poupis v. Brown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*882In opposition to the plaintiff’s prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on his causes of action pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 80-b (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]), the defendant raised triable issues of fact as to whether the engagement ring and the interest in the first West Islip property were gifts given solely in contemplation of marriage (see Lipschutz v Kiderman, 76 AD3d 178, 185-186 [2010]; Northern Trust, NA v Delley, 60 AD3d 1345 [2009]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Krzyanowski v. Eveready InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Estate of NobleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dee v. RakowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Quadrozzi v. Estate of QuadrozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rowe v. KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Bhim v. DourmashkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Broderson v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.