Legal Opinion

LaSalle Pump & Supply Co. v. Louisiana Midland Railroad

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1984No. 83-986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOUCET, Judge.

This case comes before us on appeal after we remanded it on an earlier appeal for the purpose of re-litigating the damage to the contents of a warehouse owned by La-Salle Pump & Supply Co. (hereinafter referred to as LaSalle), plaintiff-appellee, which were destroyed by a fire negligently caused by La. Midland Railroad Co. (hereinafter referred to as Midland), defendant-appellant. On remand the trial court held that the plaintiff had sufficiently proved these damages with competent evidence and awarded LaSalle $82,607.58 plus costs and legal interest from the date of judicial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Manuel v. American Employers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. LaSalle Pump & Supply Co., Inc. v. LOUISIANA MIDLAND R.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Lasalle Pump & Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Buckbee v. Aweco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. LaSalle Pump & Supply Co. v. Louisiana Midland RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API