Legal Opinion
Retained Realty, Inc. v. Estate of Spitzer
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 19, 2009No. Civil Action 3:06-CV-0493 (JCH)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES (Doc. No. 177)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Retained Realty, Inc. (“Retained”) brought this action against The Estate of Jack Spitzer and its heirs, Charlotte Spitzer, Robert Spitzer and Jil Spitzer-Fox (collectively “The Estate”), seeking foreclosure on a property mortgaged by Jack Spitzer. In a Ruling dated April 10, 2007, 2007 WL 1089781, the court granted Retained’s Motion for Summary Judgment and denied the Estate’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See Ruling (Doc. No. 87). The court subsequently entered a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Josefina Cabrales v. County of Los Angeles Ronald BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- In Re Sokolowski Debtor, Bankboston, N.A., Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Cynthia L. Sokolowski, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Davis v. PerryDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
- Conn. Hous. Fin. Auth. v. AlfaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Venture Group Enterprises, Inc. v. Vonage Business Inc. f/k/a Vonage Business Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025