Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Richey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1992No. 90-338Published

1DissentHerbert R. Brown, J.

I must respectfully dissent. For the reasons set forth below, I would overturn the sentence of death.

R.C. 2929.05 requires us to undertake a three-part analysis: the court must review proposed errors, weigh aggravating circumstances against mitigating factors, and compare the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. I disagree with all three parts of the majority’s analysis.

I

Mitigation

The majority asserts that “[njothing in the nature and circumstances of the offense offers any mitigating features.” This statement is shocking, in view of the fact that Richey actively tried to save Cynthia…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API