Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Lippman

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 19, 1990No. 19-10223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HOWARD C. BUSCHMAN, III, Bankruptcy Judge.

340 East 93d Street Corporation (“Mov-ant”) seeks an order deeming three proprie tary leases between Roy Lippman, as lessee, (“Debtor” or “Lippman”) and the Mov-ant, as lessor, rejected pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(4) and vacating the automatic stay of section 362, 11 U.S.C. § 362. In the alternative, the Movant requests an order directing payment of all post-petition maintenance charge arrearages. The Debtor objects to these requests.

I

The facts and history of this dispute are convoluted and the subject of much dispute. As the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bank of Marin v. EnglandSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. In Re Pch Associates, F/k/a Simon Associates, Debtor. Liona Corporation, N v. V. Pch AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re NassokoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Schachter v. Lefrak (In Re Lefrak)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. Alegre v. Michael H. Clement Corp. (In Re Michael H. Clement Corp.)District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  4. In Re Bonita Glen IIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1993
  5. In Re Historical Locust Street Development AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API