Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of David

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 4, 1994, which, upon reopening, ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant, a legal secretary, was asked to resign from his employment with the law firm of Rappaport, Hertz, Cherson & Rosenthal, P. C. (hereinafter the employer) because he had allegedly held himself out as an attorney. Initially, by notices dated May 10, 1993, claimant was found ineligible to receive unemployment benefits because he quit his job without a good cause or, alternatively, because he was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of Van AlphenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of FlumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API