Legal Opinion
In re the Judicial Inquiry Pursuant to the Order of Appellate Division of Supreme Court
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWalter R. Hart, J.
Petitioners moved at Special Term, Part I to quash, on stated grounds, subpoenas duces tecum calling for the production of certain records before the Justice conducting the judicial inquiry heretofore directed by order of the Appellate Division. Named as respondents to the motion are the Justice and his counsel who have made formal cross motions that the principal motions be referred to that Justice who has been designated to hold an Additional Special Term. All parties consent that the cross motions be first disposed of.
By the mandate of subdivision (a) of rule 12 of the Rules of the Supreme…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Matter of RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Sharkey v. ThurstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- People ex rel. Newton v. Special Term, Part 1, of Supreme CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- People v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Judicial Inquiry Pursuant to the Order of Appellate Division of Supreme CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1958