State v. Nilsen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, seeking remand for the purpose of resentencing. We conclude that the sentence is not sufficiently specific to enable defendant to comply with its terms or to allow defendant to know what to appeal, and we therefore remand with instructions for the trial court to specify the exact conditions of probation that it meant to impose.
Defendant contends that the court erred in imposing the “drug package” as a condition of probation. He argues that the condition embodies, in essence, the terms of ORS…
2Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MacyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021