Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Bushnell
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Justice.
Appellant, plaintiff below, is a California insurance company, doing business in Arizona. Appellee is the Director of Insurance of the State of Arizona. In February 1961, appellant filed its Premium Tax Return and a Retaliatory Tax Statement for 1960. On this return appellant contended that its tax should be computed under A.R.S. § 20-230, the Retaliatory Insurance Tax Act; that it should be given Credit for ad valorem taxes paid in Arizona; and that the tax was not due until June IS, rather than on March 31 as' provided iii A.R.S. § 20-224. Appellee agrees that appellant’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helvering v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Philadelphia Fire Assn. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The People v. . Fire Association of Phil'A.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Phœnix Insurance v. WelchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wicktor v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. Taxation Division DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Occidental Life Insurance Co. of California v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Principal Life Insurance v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003