Manahan v. Gibbons
New York Supreme Court
IN ERROR to the Supreme Court. For the facts in the case, and the judgment, of the court below, see ante p. 109. 112. S. C.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The plaintiff sued the five defendants jointly, and charged them with a joint promise to pay him for money by them had and received to his use, and *432for money lent and advanced by him to them. The sole question in the Court below was, whether the plaintiff, upon the trial of the issue, made out in proof, his charge of a joint contract, rendering the defendants jointly liable for 1,067 dollars, received to his use. The learned judge ruled, that the plaintiff had not made out his case of a joint undertaking, and with that direction left the cause to the jury, who found a verdict…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ormiston v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Cowart v. FenderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Movius v. LeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1887
- McKim v. AulbachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Banks v. ExecutorsNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.