Legal Opinion

Procopio v. Johnson

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 19, 1992No. 91 C 5495PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court are the motions to dismiss of defendants Sue Suter (“Suter”), Hephzibah Children’s Center (“Hephzi-bah”), and Lutheran Child and Family Services (“Lutheran Child”). For reasons that follow, the motions are granted.

FACTS

The plaintiffs, Joseph and Marjorie Pro-copio (the “Procopios”), were foster parents to Ashley K. from June 1984, when Ashley was approximately two months old, until July 1989. 1 A juvenile court had removed Ashley from the custody of her unmarried natural parents, both heroin addicts, and placed the child with the Illinois…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Procopio v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Taahira W. Ex Rel. McCord-Salley v. TravisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. Procopio v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API