Legal Opinion · Dissent

Whitmire v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1996No. 87535Published

1DissentHansen, Presiding Judge

I disagree with the majority. In applying the Sanders four-step test to the instant facts, the majority found, as a matter of law, that Plaintiffs injury did not arise out of Harris’ use of her car as contemplated by § 3636. However, in Sanders, the Supreme Court held the phrase “arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle,” in ordinary and comprehensive words, encompasses a broad spectrum of factual sequences which might result in injury covered by the liability insurance policy. Here, the facts establish Plaintiff could not have been abducted had it not been for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. MouseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Byus v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Bingham v. McArthurCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. Temeron, Inc. v. Ferraro Energy Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API