Legal Opinion

Bodosky v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1928No. 11834Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

At a former day of the term the appeal was dismissed because the record then before us failed to show that any notice of appeal was given. Appellant, in connection with his motion to re-instate the appeal has filed a supplemental transcript which shows that notice of appeal was in fact entered but was inadvertently omitted from the transcript. The appeal is re-instated and the case will now be considered on its merits.

Only one bill of exception appears in the record. It complains at the order of the court in overruling the motion for new trial and attempts to bring forward by the motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Kellum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API