Legal Opinion

Pauline v. Weinberger

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 21, 1975No. Civ. A. No. C 74-61 YPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CONTIE, District Judge.

Defendant has moved the Court for summary judgment. Upon consideration and for the reasons stated below, the motion shall be granted.

This is an action for review of the decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying plaintiff’s claim for Black Lung benefits as the widow of a miner, under Title IV of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended, 30 U.S.C. Section 901 et seq. Section 413(b) of the'Act, 30 U.S.C. § 923(b), incorporates by reference Sections 205(g) of the Social Security Act. Thus, if there is substantial evidence…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Butliewicz v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Hash v. CalifanoDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API