Powell v. Jerome
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The petition set out a cause of action, and the court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.
The Code, § 18-314, provides: “It shall be the duty of the railroad companies of this State to furnish to any grower of peaches . . or other perishable products, suitable icing and refrigerator cars, or other suitable cars for the transportation of such products.” It is contended by counsel for the plaintiffs in error that, regardless of whether the local agent made an agree ment with the plaintiff to furnish top-icing, it would not be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wilson v. Atlanta & Charlotte Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Chattanooga Southern Railroad v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. StallingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bell v. FitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948