Legal Opinion

Kemp v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1932No. 6 Div. 43PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The evidence for the state tending to convict the defendant consists of the testimony of an accomplice as to the main facts, and other testimony tending to prove that the confessed thief was in company with defendant during the night of the alleged crime. The law is that a conviction for felony cannot be had on the testimony of an accomplice, unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and such corroborative evidence, if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof, is not sufficient. Code 1923, §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Segars v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Wallis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kimmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Senn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Pryor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Commander v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Evans v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API