Legal Opinion

Ringler v. Jetter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 1923No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J.:

The motion was to separately state causes of action said to be combined in one statement, and to strike out redundant and immaterial matter.

The complaint, although very much more articulate and wordy than is necessary for its purpose and very far removed from a plain and concise statement of facts constituting the cause, is merely a stockholders’ action against alleged derelict directors, asking for various kinds of relief common to defendants, and in one instance relating to an alleged fraudulent transfer to an individual defendant by asserted conniving directors. The first branch…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pitts v. Howe Scale Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  2. Covey v. England & McCaffrey, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Bronson v. MillikinNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ringler v. JetterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API