Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Walker v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 19, 1999No. 98-KH-0916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

733 So.2d 1178 (1999)

STATE ex rel. Michael WALKER

v.

STATE of Louisiana.

No. 98-KH-0916.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 19, 1999.

PER CURIAM.[*]

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel for relator and hold a hearing at which it will determine whether the state's use of his silence at a preliminary hearing to impeach the testimony he subsequently offered at trial violated the rule of Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976) and had a substantial and injurious effect on the jury's verdict.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. DukeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. State v. RosetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GrantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API