Legal Opinion
Motter v. Wallace
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 18, 1934No. Nos. 995, 996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
_ , These actions were brought by Thomas Wallace and Janies Stanton, Sr., to recover At aj d?nnwí»n * a- le •. $10,030 and $9,917.69, respectively, alleged o . . , n ,, overpayments of their income taxes for the iV>ot m» i • j> t ii x year 1921. Ihe claims of both taxpayers vii ,, j ,. are predicated upon the same transactions. o , '1,1 j • n By agreement oi the parties the cases were vi.-, • -t i consolidated, a jury was duly waived, and the issues tried to the court.
' The material facts are these: Ihomas Wallace, James otancon, Sr., and Janies Stanton, Jr., were…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Farney v. HauserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Burgess v. BadgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arrigoni v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Malden Trust Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Arrigoni v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Bennett Glass & Paint Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of Blazzard v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.