State v. Levato
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
Gregory A Levato (“defendant”) appeals his convictions for nine counts of theft and the sentences imposed. He assigns the following as errors by the trial court: one, accepting the jury’s verdict in his absence and, two, permitting the prosecutor to question the victims regarding the sources of their investment money. 1 For the following reasons, we reverse the convictions.
FACTS 2 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The defendant and Carl Bonnivier, acquaintances from prior investment dealings, formed Alert Mortgage Corporation (“AMC”), a mortgage-banking and -brokering business. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, Superintendent, David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- State v. LevatoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, Superintendent, David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, Superintendent, David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996