Legal Opinion

Williams v. Harmon

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 5, 1990No. 01-90-00155-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Relator, Howard Vanzandt Williams, complains that the Honorable William Harmon denied his petition for a preconviction writ of habeas corpus without providing him a hearing. Williams seeks a writ of prohibition barring Judge Harmon from trying him on charges of possession of a controlled substance.

Williams has failed to show that Judge Harmon had a duty to provide a hearing. Whether a trial court issues a writ of habeas corpus is a matter of discretion. Ex parte Fowler, 573 S.W.2d 241, 244 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). The trial court has no duty to grant a hearing unless it first issues the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nichlos v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Ex Parte FowlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Carter, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  2. Ex Parte Bui, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  3. Ex Parte Christopher Standage, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Ex parte CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Gerald Hayes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API