Legal Opinion

Farnum v. Buffum

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1849PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This was a writ of entry upon a mortgage, to recover seizin and possession of several tracts of land situated in Blackstone, formerly Mendon, in this county, and was tried before Hopkinson, J., in the court of common pleas.

Read the full summary

This was a writ of entry upon a mortgage, to recover seizin and possession of several tracts of land situated in Blackstone, formerly Mendon, in this county, and was tried before Hopkinson, J., in the court of common pleas. The mortgage on which the suit was founded was given by Henry S. Mansfield to Richmond Bullock, bearing date June 29th, 1844, and assigned by the mortgagee to the plaintiff on the 14th of August, 1847. These deeds were duly recorded, but it was objected by the defendant, that the registry of the deed of assignment was inoperative, because Henry Martin, a notary public in…

1Opinion of the CourtWilde, J.

The demandant’s title in this case is derived from one Henry S. Mansfield by this deed of mortgage to Richmond Bullock, and by his deed of assignment to the demandant.

To this title, it was objected, at the trial, that the deed of assignment was inoperative, because Henry Martin, a notary public in the state of Rhode Island, taking the acknowledgment of it, did not authenticate his act by a notarial seal. This objection was overruled. And the first question is, whether it was rightly overruled.

By the Rev. Sts. c. 59, § 13, it is provided, that deeds of real estate may be acknowledged “ before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dumont v. McCrackenIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
  2. Hinckley v. O'FarrelIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Darling v. PurcellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API